Brick outpolled seven different common cladding
materials for sustainability according to a major building industry
survey.
The Sustainability Survey* commissioned by Ibstock Brick, revealed
that long life, low maintenance and re-usability were major reasons
that brick was selected over materials like timber, render and
PVC-u. 94% of architects also said that sustainability of materials
was important or very important in their work.
“Overall, the survey confirms that Ibstock’s long commitment to
sustainability in brick manufacture matches architects’ views on the
main sustainability issues,” comments Ibstock Marketing Manager,
Andrew Halstead Smith.
Five major sectors including architects, supply chain and builders
at different levels were surveyed. Questions included how they
viewed sustainability in the industry and the effects on their
business.
The sustainability of materials was a key issue, covering 9 factors,
including long life, re-usability, low maintenance requirements and
aesthetics, from 7 different cladding materials. Brick came top or
second in most of the categories - better than any other material.
Not as many architects (73%) said they had written sustainability
policies as main contractors (89%), for example. Despite this,
architects were considered to be the main force behind
sustainability in the building industry and were more interested
(76%) in a supplier’s sustainability credentials, than the industry
average (67%).
Architects could offer a wide variety of definitions of
sustainability, from using resources prudently and minimising
building impact on the environment to providing a healthy
environment for a building’s occupants. With main contractors,
architects shared the best and most complete understanding of the
issues at stake.
A small carbon footprint and energy efficiency were the most popular
named issues amongst architects, followed closely by waste and water
recycling, locally sourced materials and CO2 reduction - all at or
around 90%. However, architects were less worried about packaging
waste (c. 50%), or increased use of natural materials (60%) and
reducing raw material cost was around 30%.
Waste recycling was more important to other respondents such as
housebuilders and main contractors, whereas small general builders
were more concerned with raw material costs and locally sourced
materials than almost any other group.
*The Ibstock Sustainability Survey April – May 2007, included
qualitative and quantitative research amongst more than 250 building
industry professionals, with main groups being architects, builders'
merchants, main contractors, housebuilders and general jobbing
builders.
Email: nicola.poyser@iassmarts.com