Subscribe to our weekly newsletters
Subscribe to newsletter

 

Editor's Note:  CIOB provide:-

Building Control and StandardsBuilding Control and Standards
Conservation, Maintenance andConservation, Maintenance and RefurbishmentRefurbishment
Facilities Management
Faculty of Architecture and SurveyingFaculty of Architecture and Surveying
Health and SafetyHealth and Safety
Innovation and ResearchInnovation and Research
Legal and Dipate ResolutionLegal and Dipate Resolution
Pre-construction SocietyPre-construction Society
Project Management ServicesProject Management Services

Request Information

Home
Include Article
Advertise
 

Links
Request Information
Terms of use
Contact

 

Request Facilities / Interiors product information

Request Architectural product information external

Request Architectural product information internal

Request Mechanical HVAC product information

Request Electrical product information

 

   

CIOB - Is the Government building for the future? Asks the CIOB

A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has shown the majority of government departments and agencies as failing to meet targets to make their new buildings and major refurbishments sustainable.
Chris Blythe, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) said, "Sustainability and the way we build the future is a serious issue and needs greater cohesion between the Government and the Industry. The report highlights that a lack of consistency and responsibility are part of the problem. The Government must create a more joined up approach to the construction industry, which is the only way we can successfully tackle these issues. We would question whether the current system is building for the future or just treading water."
The report found that most departments have started to consider sustainability in construction and refurbishment projects. But departments are not consistently carrying out the required environmental assessments on new projects. In 2005-06 only 35 per cent (37 of 106) of new builds and 18 per cent (61 of 335) of major refurbishment projects had carried out, or planned to carry out, these environmental assessments
The NAO, with the assistance of specialist consultants, examined a sample of projects that had not been assessed. Of these, 80 per cent would have failed to meet the required assessment standards. But the report also identifies some examples of good practice, including the refurbishment of offices by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the refurbishment of the Treasury's headquarters and Defence Estates' construction of Welbeck Defence Sixth Form College.
Sir John Bourn, head of the NAO, said, "When I last reported on construction in 2005, I emphasised the need to consider both the costs and benefits over the whole life of a building, not just the initial capital required. Despite this, today's report highlights a continuing failure by departments to consider the long-term value of sustainability in their new builds and refurbishments. This is particularly disappointing given the importance of sustainability in promoting a deeper understanding of value for money.
"Government departments and agencies spend in the region of £3 billion each year on new builds and major refurbishments. If sustainability is well handled, and addressed at the very beginning of construction projects, it can and should provide better value for money in the long term."
The NAO report identified a number of barriers to progress towards more sustainable buildings on the government estate including:
a fragmentation of policy responsibility among government bodies for improving sustainable construction and refurbishment and an absence of a coherent approach to monitoring progress and ensuring compliance;
a widespread perception of conflict between sustainability and value for money, partly because project teams are failing to assess the long-term costs and benefits of more sustainable approaches;
a lack of sufficient knowledge and expertise in sustainable procurement among those departmental staff responsible for construction and refurbishment; and
a failure to specify expected benefits and undertake rigorous post-occupancy reviews to evaluate performance against them, and the consequent lack of robust data to inform business appraisals for new projects.
A full copy of the NAO report is available.

Email: stownsend@ciob.org.uk
 


News Archives - by Weeks  
2007 (weeks)  
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
9-10
11-12
13-14
15-16
17-18
19-20
21-22
23-24
25-26
27-28
29-30
31-32
33-34
35-36
37-38
39-40
41-42
43-44
45-46
47-48
49-50
51-52
 

Arundel Jones Associates Ltd
Hill Farm, Linton Hill, Maidstone, Kent ME17 4AL
Tel : 01622 745333
news@buildingdesign.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales No. 07334149
 

News Categories : Building Control and Standards
Conservation, Mainenance and Refurbishment
Facilities Management
Facuilty of Architecture and Surveying
Health and Safety
Innovation and Research
Legal and Dipate Resolution
Pre-construction Society
Project Management Services